Tuesday, November 15, 2011

Stop using this "quote" by Thomas Jefferson

"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and and give to those who would not."

This is not Thomas Jefferson's quote.  The earliest appearance of this statement was 1986.

However, he did say this:
To take from one, because it is thought that his own industry and that of his fathers has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, the guarantee to every one of a free exercise of his industry, & the fruits acquired by it. 
If we're going to do a movement right, let's start with not inserting words into our Founding Fathers' mouths.

Saturday, October 15, 2011

OWS: "You may be passionate but it is not enough to resolve the crisis"


Some dude from the UK put it best, and I think every American should be embarrassed of this.  Education is the best start to figuring out a solution, not just protesting with a vague list of demands.  The wealthy know that the middle class and poor are dumb about money and the economy (and it's true).  Once we figure this out, we can have an intelligent conversation about this and find solutions.  In the meantime, I'm getting back to work. 

This is taken from the comments section of the article "Here's What the Wall Street Protesters Are So Angry About," in reference to a slew of charts depicting what the OWS are protesting (even though they don't really know it?) 

Jatin Luthia · Ealing, United Kingdom
Though the data is correct, the context of analysis is definitely incorrect. American labor has been winning compared to the rest of the world for a long time. The current disparity has largely risen from the fact that while capital has largely stayed in the US and labor has partially equalised over the rest of the world. Bear in mind though that wages in India and China are indeed less. With businesses getting more complex and global, CEOs are likely to get paid more (Though some amounts are obnoxious). It is businesses job to be competitive and make profits and it is labor's job to be competitive. If it is too costly to hire someone, economics will dictate that labor will move elsewhere. If wall street protests do make wall street dysfunctional, then capital will move away too and it will just be a double-whammy for labor as capital is a very competitive resource that US has especially as the Dollar holds out as a currency of choice. Such simplistic graphs and comments distort long-term economic realities and the result of years of trade and labour barriers followed by the developed world. Once the barriers started lifting, economic reality became different. I think more people need to understand economics than simply blame capital as capital has no direct social commitment. Its commitment to society is more indirect and derivative.
Reply ·  1 · Like · Follow Post · 15 hours ago

  • Henry Harvey
    So what you're saying is that it's the job of business to be competitive and make profit, even if it means throwing out of work the people that live in the country where that business originated.

    The inherent unfairness in globalization is that a company can relocate whereas I can't realistically move my family to another country.

    I don't think one could be seen as opposed to capital per se if the wish is only to see a situation in which the people who manage corporations invest capital in the countries and the people who have helped them to get so rich and powerful.

    Much of the rage in the Occupy Wall Street movement comes from the realization that the multinational corporations and the financial institutions are selling us short, both literally and figuratively.
    Reply ·  1 · Like · 11 hours ago


  • Jatin Luthia · Ealing, United Kingdom
    Henry Harvey Your comments are not economically driven. I am saying what incents each section of business. It is definitely the job of business to be competitive and make profits. Origination of business is very relative. Most American conglomerates earn more revenues overseas. How do you define "Origination"? Incorporation is not sufficient to define origination. You may be passionate but it is not enough to resolve the crisis. I think a matured response combining passion, economics and politics would be more useful. Otherwise, it may sound like irrational rabble-rousing and leave the US insular and lagging. The key to success of the US economy has been its adaptability.
    Reply · Like · 6 hours ago

Thursday, June 02, 2011

Social Media, News, and my Shopping Habits

How about this for making news outlets flocking to social media:  I no longer get my first dose of news from a conventional journalist-type source, but from Facebook.

In the last month or so, I have found out on Facebook that:

1) Shaquille O'Neal is retiring.
2) Elizabeth Taylor and Michael Jackson died.
3) There was a tornado in MA, which hit very close to some of my family in CT.
4) The Vancouver Canucks won Game 1 of the Stanley Cup final.
5) A luxury candle company has a not-so-luxurious PR firm.

Okay, that last one just annoyed the heck out of me - I won a free candle on Facebook.  I've won a lot of other stuff online too (I got a free bottle of Clinique skin tone evener on Twitter) because I'm kind of a troll that way, but the candle did not come to me for over a month.  After speaking with the girl at the PR firm who handled it when the candle was two weeks late, still no candle by Memorial Day weekend - and I ended up copying the luxury candle company on my next email voicing my disappointment.  I got an email from who I assume was the PR firm manager overnighting the candle to me.  We'll see if it's on my doorstep for real by 3 p.m. today, but seriously?  Aren't PR firms paid not to do this crap?

ANYWAY.  The excitement in my life comes less from reading headlines and more from seeing what my friends are reporting.  I can of course get the details from other news outlets, of course, but even Shaq took to Twitter to report his big news, and you know CNN had some peons watching Twitter feeds to report anything that might be newsworthy.

Isn't it strange how slowly, surely, the media middleman is becoming a periphery to our source of gossip and news instead of the center?  I remember watching the 6 o'clock news every night with Peter Jennings when I was kid, right before Wheel of Fortune and Jeopardy! came on.  Even more so, my parents would probably recall how they found out about the Challenger explosion through the TV; even back in 2001 when 9/11 happened, I heard about it on the radio first.

But not today.  A measly 10 years after 9/11 and I no longer check CNN or BBC first; it's Facebook I go to catch up first, then review the news later.  Granted, the gossipy-type news usually is filtered first through social media, not the international news or conflicts that many Americans don't choose or care to follow, but then again I have a social circle that does extend beyond the U.S., and I end up finding things that might be popular overseas before anyone here even knows about it.  Amazing.

What else does social media bring me?  A freaking ton of coupons, that's what.  Any time I sign up for something, it's because I saw it on Facebook.  ShoeDazzle, Ideeli.com, Sephora, Bluefly... this targeted ad stuff is really quite scary.  I've been eying a dress for a few days and it kept coming up on every ad that I saw, no matter what website I'd go to.  Eventually I got a coupon in my email and was able to purchase the dress for another 30% off, but still... how do you put on blinders to this stuff?  At least we had an excuse to ignore billboards when we're driving down the thruway, but you can't avoid moving ads and audio clips when you're trying to read the news.

If you don't hear from me for another four months, just make sure I didn't get sucked into another ad vortex and am drowning in email special offers.  If you'll excuse me, I need to sign up for email notifications from the newest partnership between Groupon and Expedia.

Thursday, February 17, 2011

Unionize, Privatize, Budgetize

Wisconsin schools call off classes as budget protests continue

You've seen this story before - maybe in a town near you.  It's been rampant the last few years, the public workers of this country beginning to feel the pinch of their states' budgets.  It's been felt acutely in states such as California and New York, but now Wisconsin is on the national media radar with several school systems canceling classes, anticipating that several teachers will protest a bill asking them to pay more towards their benefits and take away most of their collective bargaining rights.

I've never had the pleasure of working in the public sector before (there's a touch of sarcasm there), although the benefits are quite cushy and have been for some time.  Many workers both public and private enjoy the protection of unions, formed in order to protect the rights and prevent the abuse of workers.  Low-skill workers used to be taken advantage of by deplorable working conditions and low wages.

Today, the prevalence of low pay and dangerous work conditions are mitigated by the presence of unions, and while that's all and good, unions have now shifted their focus to securing adequate pay and benefits increases on a regular basis.  For government unions, this comes at the expense of the taxpayers, of which most are in the private sector and suffering their own conundrum of their employers reducing their benefits, but with no rights to picket.  (For private unions, they usually only have one choice - keep paying out the nose until they go bankrupt and EVERYONE loses their job.  Detroit is a good example of this.)

This perhaps is less about yet another picketing school system than more about what needs to be done, first starting at the national level and encouraging states to follow suit.  The bigwigs in Washington are going about this in the wrong direction:  By pushing more costs onto the taxpayer and borrowing money that doesn't exist, we are creating a hole from which our children and grandchildren may never escape.  In other words, the Big Government is trying to do this all on their own, instead of seeking out private companies to assist when budget cuts strike - programs for the elderly and disabled, for example.

I fear that more people will start looking upon unionized workers with scorn.  I think people have a fundamental right to living with enough income, but at the same time, why shouldn't they cough up a little more dough to cover their benefits?  Pay raises are great and should be given when deserved; but here I am, having been down the road where our benefits disappeared and had to pay for insurance entirely out of pocket, and  my income is slowly being cut, not raised.  And they're protesting that they need to help balance a budget that they are a part of?

No.  If we're going to get out of this mess, start protesting for something that makes sense.  Let's back up and look at how the private sector can help balance budgets.  Start finding organizations to supplement the after-school programs, programs for those with learning disabilities, and sports.  If teachers want the extra pay and full benefits coverage, then they need to see the bigger issue at hand:  Not that unions are being unfairly targeted, but that the government just doesn't know how to run itself, and that nothing short of a creative solution will have the most benefit.  

Here's some point by point commentary on the CNN article above:

  • Today 24,500 students missed school because the Wisconsin Education Association Council asked people to "stand beside your neighbors, family and friends and help our voices be heard."  Well, that's just selfish now.  It's MY VOICE, I WANT TO BE HEARD.  Not everybody else.  Not everyone else who is suffering from budget cuts, JUST ME.  What kind of "collective bargaining" is that?!
  • The deficit in Wisconsin is in the billions over the next two years.  Billions!  That's nine zeros to deal with!  How can we demand fiscal responsibility and expect states to operate on a budget (just like most average Americans do) without everyone feeling the pinch?  Call it a job hazard.  Don't protest and leave the students hanging; figure out how to use your unions to target irresponsible spending and find results that work, starting with finding legislators who will do such a thing, and vote for them.  More than ever we need properly educated children to compete against other first-world economies, and whether you like it or not, China is right there with us and owns most of our debt. 
  • WI governor Scott Walker says he understands the legal protests, but wants "taxpayers of Wisconsin [to] have their chance to have their voices heard."  Bingo and bingo.  Peaceful protesting makes this country great, but if I'm paying for teachers' salaries and benefits, let's make sure the money is going to the right place.  That's my right as a taxpaying citizen.
  • Okay, and now teachers have to pay more of their pension.  What is a pension and how can a self-employed businesswoman like me get in on that?  Oh, wait.  Never mind.  
  • Pay raises limited to inflation - sensible, and again, living within their means.  Unless the government can get (legally) creative in balancing the budget, this is what it should be limited to for now.  
  • At least they still have some collective bargaining rights.  If they were to completely do away with that (which I don't think is legally possible), then you'd see the entire state shut down.
  • Bryan Kennedy, president of the AFT-Wisconsin, states that the bill is a "smokescreen" and that the debate is "not a financial issue.  It is about worker rights."  Uh, Mr. Kennedy, if you're on someone else's budget, then it is a financial issue.  You can't just set the education budget off to the side and let everyone else suffer the cuts.  If government refuses to resolve the problem by making sweeping changes to the way they do business, then everyone needs to take part of the fall.  
  • A video of one union worker states that "If Wisconsin [collective bargaining] falls, so does the nation."  ORLY?  When did you get so damn important, since you won the Super Bowl?  (Just kidding.)  Seriously though, if setting a precedent is their concern, then set the right one.  Don't picket again and expect a different outcome.  Isn't that defined as insanity?
  • Ah, and absent teachers this week would be docked pay if they didn't have a doctor's note.  Good for them. 
  • A voice of reason:  Superintendent Daniel Nerad is asking Walker to re-bargain collective bargaining, but also acknowledging that their "no. 1 responsibility is to instruct students."  Yes, that's exactly what should be happening.  
Look, I understand we all need to live.  We all want and need something that our government can't provide us, and in this great country, we can usually find a way to get it.  It's not ever easy but in this day and age, we can do it.  That's why I wonder why we place so much power into the government, including our money, without pushing for some sensible resolutions to these shortfalls.  The private sector is dying for jobs and cash flow; private workers are poised to spend their money again if only they can get the job.  It's all there and we can't connect the damn dots!   And instead, the government insists on getting bigger to handle the problem when they don't have the tools to deal with it.

Well, we can hardly blame them; the majority voted in a democratic majority two years ago, and now we have a Republican majority in the House with a Democratic President and Senate, and bipartisanship is less chivalrous than traitorous.  We know that red and blue don't make purple, they make war.  

And while unions work to keep their workers safe and paid, who knows what will happen if people start to wonder why union workers keep getting their higher-than-normal benefits at the expense of corporations (private) or taxpayers (government)?  Could corporations simply lay off their workers and hire some other folks who agree not to join the union?  Of course they can.  There are people desperate enough out there for ANY job that they'd do it.  And if the government started thinking that way, they'd be able to find folks out of work who'd do anything - including a promise not to unionize - just to get that job. 
Photobucket
Powered By Blogger